Which statement would most likely be made by an opponent of the Supreme courts decision in Engel

If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Which statement would most likely be made by an opponent of the supreme court’s decision in engel v. vitale? a. people should not have to restrict their free exercise of religion just because they happen to be in a school. b. public institutions need to avoid any involvement with religious activity, even if it seems minor or harmless. c. students who do not practice a religion need to feel comfortable in and supported by their public schools. d. religious activity in public schools is a dangerous violation of the separation of church and state.

The case ruled that forcing public school students to do a morning prayer is unconstitutional because it somehow violates one of the basic right of the constitution, the freedom of religion.

no statement

answer is b Explanation: just took it

answer: ‘no one should be discriminated against because he or she is not from a minority group’ because—> affirmative action means ‘a policy or program that provides opportunities for traditionally disadvantaged groups to them overcome the effects of discrimination’

government must protect citizens from abuse by insurance Explanation:

Answer 6

hu what are the statements

Answer 7

I just did this on apex. This is an alternative A.  No on should be discriminated against because he or she is not from a minority group.

no one should discriminated against because he or she is not from a minority group

The correct answer is The individual mandate is unconstitutional.

0

The correct option is B. Taxpayers should not have to pay for others people’s health care
An opponent of the Great Society would be opposed to programs that are aimed at creating equality through a large welfare state due to the need for the programs to be financed by taxpayers

Yes, unless they can distinguish their case from the case the Supreme Court decided. For more information, see Related Questions, below.