Why is clinical decision making important in nursing

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

• Limited access to clinical or professional articles

• Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content

1. Sitzia J: Barriers to research utilization: the clinical setting and nurses themselves. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2001, 5 (3): 154-164. 10.1054/ejon.2000.0115.

   CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

2. World Health Organization: Strategic Directions for Strengthening Nursing and Midwifery Services. 2002, [http://www.wpro.who.int/themes_focuses/theme3/focus2/nursingmidwifery.pdf]

   Google Scholar 

3. Nursing Association of New Brunswick: Decision-Making in Clinical Nursing Practice. [http://www.nanb.nb.ca/pdf_e/Publications/General_PublicationsDecision-making_in_clinical_nursing_practice_English.pdf]

4. White A: Clinical Decision Making Among Fourth-Year Nursing Students: An Interpretive Study. Journal of Nursing Education. 2003, 42 (3): 113-120.

   PubMed  Google Scholar 

5. O'Reilly P: Barriers to effective clinical decision making in nursing. [http://www.clininfo.health.nsw.gov.au/hospolic/stvincents/1993/a04.html]

6. Hamers JPH, Abu-Saad H, Halfens RJG, Schumacher JNM: Factors influencing nurses' pain assessment and interventions in children. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1994, 20 (5): 853-860. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20050853.x.

   CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

7. Bird A, Wallis M: Nursing knowledge and assessment skills in the management of patient receiving analgesia via epidural infusion. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002, 40 (5): 522-531. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02409.x.

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

8. McCaughan D, Thompson C, Cullum N, Sheldon , Thompson D: Acute care nurses' perception of barriers to using research information in clinical decision-making. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002, 39 (1): 46-60. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02241.x.

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

9. Strauss A, Corbin J: Basics of qualitative research; Grounded theory procedures and techniques. 1994, Newbury Park: Sage publications

   Google Scholar 

10. Pidgeon N: Grounded Theory: theoretical background. In: Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences. Edited by: Richardson JTE. 1996, British Psychological Society Books

    Google Scholar 

11. Backman K, Kyngas HA: Challenges of the grounded theory approach to a novice researcher. Nursing and Health Sciences. 1999, 1 (3): 147-53. 10.1046/j.1442-2018.1999.00019.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

12. Strauss A, Corbin J: Grounded theory methodology. In Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Edited by: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. 1998, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 158-183.

    Google Scholar 

13. Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR: Qualitative research in nursing, advancing the humanistic imperative. 2003, Philadelphia, Lippincott

    Google Scholar 

14. Polit DF, Beck CT, Hungler BP: Essential of nursing research, methods, appraisal, and utilization. 1999, Philadelphia, Lippincott, 5

    Google Scholar 

15. Baker J: Nurses' Perceptions Of Clinical Decision-Making In Relation To Patients In Pain. PhD thesis, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Nursing, Department of Family and Community Nursing. 2001

    Google Scholar 

16. Lauri S, Salantera S: Decision-making models of Finnish nurses and public health nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1995, 21 (3): 520-527.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

17. Parker C, Minick P, Kee CC: Clinical decision-making processes in perioperative nursing. AORN Journal. 1999, 70 (1): 45-62.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

18. Bell KW: The Relationship Between Perceived Physical Competence and the Physical Activity Patterns of Fifth and Seventh Grade Children. PhD thesis. Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 1997, [http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-61497-18756/unrestricted/bellDiss.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

19. Bandura A: Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. 1997, New York, NY: NH Freeman & Company

    Google Scholar 

20. Lazarus RS, Folkman S: Stress, appraisal, and coping. 1984, New York, Springer Pub. Co

    Google Scholar 

21. Kruzich JM: Empowering organizational contexts: patterns and predictors of perceived decision-making influence among staff in nursing homes. Gerontologist. 1995, 35: 207-216.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

22. East FJ: Empowerment through welfare-rights organizing: A feminist perspective. Nursing Administration. 2000, 15 (2): 311-328. 10.1177/08861090022093886.

    Google Scholar 

23. Madjar I: Project to review and examine expectations of beginning registered nurses in the workforce,. Nurses Registration Board of New South Wales. 1997

    Google Scholar 

24. Fulton Y: Nurses views of empowerment: a critical social theory perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1997, 26 (3): 529-539. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-13-00999.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

25. Roberts SJ: Development of a positive professional identity: Liberating oneself from the oppressor within. Advances in Nursing Science. 2000, 22 (4): 71-82.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

26. Krairiksh M, Anthony MK: Benefits and outcomes of staff nurses' participation in decision-making. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2001, 31 (1): 16-23.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

27. Anthony MK: The relationship of authority to decision-making behavior: implications for redesign. Research in Nursing & Health. 1999, 22 (5): 388-98. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199910)22:5<388::AID-NUR5>3.0.CO;2-B.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

28. Laschinger HKS, Fingan J, Shamian J, Casier S: Organizational trust and empowerment in registered healthcare setting: effects on staff nurse commitment. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2000, 30 (9): 413-425.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

29. Brown CL: A theory of the process of creating power in relationships. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 2002, 26 (2): 15-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Manojlovich M, Ketefian S: The Effects of Organizational Culture on Nursing Professionalism: Implications for Health Resource Planning. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 2002, 33 (4): 15-34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

31. MacPhee M, Scott J: The Role of Social Support Networks for Rural Hospital Nurses: Supporting and Sustaining the Rural Nursing Work Force. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2002, 32 (5): 264-272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

32. Naidu S, Olver M, Koronios A: Approaching Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Practice with Interactive Multimedia and Case-Based Reasoning. [http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/1999/2/03/index.asp]

33. Espeland K, Shanta L: Empowering versus enabling in academia. Journal of Nursing Education. 2001, 40: 342-346.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

34. Myrick F: Perceptorship and critical thinking in nursing education. PhD thesis. 1998, University of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing

    Google Scholar 

• The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/3/2/prepub

Page 2

• Policies
• Accessibility
• Press center

• Support and Contact
• Leave feedback
• Careers

Follow BMC

• BMC Twitter page
• BMC Facebook page
• BMC Weibo page