What was the outcome of most efforts to improve Chinese working conditions on the transcontinental railroad?

Every May, tourists gather in Promontory Summit, Utah, to watch two trains meet nose to nose on tracks first laid more than 150 years ago. The Central Pacific Railroad’s Jupiter, painted blue with red and gold accents, whistles as steam billows against a clear sky and rolling hills. Facing it, the Union Pacific Railroad’s red-and-gold 119, its bell swinging, slows to a stop. 

Both are near-exact replicas of the original Jupiter and 119 trains that ran in 1869, now used in the reenactment of the Golden Spike ceremony. On May 10, 1869, a gleaming golden spike was carefully tapped into place by Leland Stanford, president of Central Pacific Railroad. An engraving on the spike proclaimed: “May God continue the unity of our country, as this railroad unites the two great oceans of the world.” With that one act, Stanford marked the completion of the transcontinental railroad.

In the wake of the Civil War, the railroad became a symbol of progress intended to propel the divided country toward cohesion. Built largely by Chinese and Irish immigrants and Mormon laborers, the railroad made it easier for travelers and goods to move through the nation, but it also laid the foundation for deepening racial divides that are still felt today.

The May anniversary of the railroad’s completion coincides with Asian Pacific American Heritage Month. This year, it also comes at a time of increasing anti-Asian hate crimes worldwide amid an ongoing pandemic that disproportionately affects communities of color. The roots of anti-Asian racism across the United States stretch back hundreds of years. Remembering this context can help make sense of today’s violence, which is critical to building a new future.

“For as long as Asians have been in America, we’ve been seen as outsiders who can’t be trusted, and that misperception has often led to tragic consequences,” says Chris Lu, former U.S. deputy secretary of labor. “If you understand this history, you can better understand why the political rhetoric associating Asian Americans with COVID-19 is so unacceptable.”

Like parallel tracks, stories of unity and division run through history. There is the story of a fledgling nation built on immigrant and slave labor beginning its shaky but swift ascent to global power. Alongside that is the oft-forgotten narrative of anti-Asian racism codified first in sentiment, then in law in America.

For me, a third-generation, biracial Chinese American woman, questions of progress and identity ring louder than ever.

Remembering the workers

An estimated 10,000–20,000 Chinese men joined the Central Pacific Union to complete the backbreaking labor of clearing the way for the railroad. Working 10–12 hour shifts during six-day work weeks, they dug through some of the most treacherous stretches of terrain, crawling into gaps and carving tunnels through the Sierra Nevada mountains from the inside out. They were paid less than other workers and denied room and board. After the railroad was completed, a slew of anti-Chinese legislation passed.

The Page Act of 1875, one of the earliest pieces of federal legislation that restricted immigration from East Asia, stopped almost all Chinese women from entering the country, stereotyping them as prostitutes. Then came the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which barred anyone from China and declared Chinese immigrants ineligible for naturalization. This legislation made it nearly impossible for Chinese families to set roots in America.

(One of the largest mass lynchings in the U.S. targeted Chinese immigrants.)

For more than 100 years, Chinese workers’ contributions were obscured and diminished. Indeed, few official remembrances were constructed over the decades. In May 2014, Lu helped induct these men into the U.S. Department of Labor’s Hall of Honor. “This was a small way that we could begin to give them the official recognition they rightfully deserve,” he says, reflecting on that day. “We'll never know the names of most of these Chinese workers, but their sacrifices were responsible for one of the greatest engineering feats in U.S. history.”

Today, the plaque is displayed in the North Plaza of the department's Frances Perkins Building in Washington, D.C. In Utah, visitors can stand under the Chinese Arch, a unique rock formation overlooking the valley. These were the result of descendants tirelessly advocating for their ancestors’ story to be told.

A more complete history

Remembering these workers isn’t important only to Asian American history, it’s vital to American history. “The work of history is crucial for us to understand how U.S. society developed, how people have tried to transform it, and what worked or failed,” says Manu Karuka, assistant professor of American Studies at Barnard College. “The stories we tell about the past can play crucial functions in how we understand identity: who we identify with, and who we identify against.”

(These little-known sites help families connect to Asian American history.)

In 1969, at the centennial anniversary of the completion of the railroad, U.S. Secretary of Transportation John Volpe paid tribute to those who worked on the railroad. “Who else but Americans could drill 10 tunnels in mountains 30 feet deep in snow?” he said. “Who else but Americans could chisel through miles of solid granite? Who else but Americans could have laid 10 miles of track in 12 hours?”

Of course, it was the Chinese workers who did this, while being denied the ability to become Americans. And yet, is there anything more American than an immigrant? Fifty years after Volpe’s speech, at the 150th anniversary celebration in 2019, a new transportation secretary addressed the crowd—Taiwanese immigrant Elaine Chao. While her appointment and participation marked a significant moment, there’s still a long way to go.

(One writer grapples with the complexities of Asian American identity in the U.S.)

All told, 1,776 miles of track had been laid between Sacramento, California, and Omaha, Nebraska. Later, much of the original steel from the tracks was pried up to fill metal needs during World War II. America’s continuous story of independence and reinvention begs the questions: What is essential to America, and now that the oceans are connected, where will the tides bring us next?

“The history of railroads speaks to this moment in very particular ways. Whether we are thinking about climate change, migration, or war, studying railroad histories can clarify some of the political questions of our own day,” says Karuka. “History, of course, is made by individuals, but not by conditions they choose. How individuals build unity with others, what forms of organization they develop, and how they focus and sustain their resistance are some of the most important questions we can be thinking about in our own fraught moment.”

Back at Golden Spike National Historic Park in Utah, visitors may notice another tribute in the light green stone embedded in the visitors center’s walls. Park administrators chose to incorporate the cuprous quartzite stone to honor the Chinese workers’ contributions. The stone is only found in one local quarry—and in China.

It may be easy to miss, but the next time I visit, I’ll be looking for it, and I’ll remember the history.

Ray Rogers is a writer based in the Washington, D.C. area.

By Meera Muñoz Pandya, Intern

What was the outcome of most efforts to improve Chinese working conditions on the transcontinental railroad?
Transcontinental Railroad Forever stamps, issued May 10, 2019. ©USPS; all rights reserved.

2019 marks 150 years since the completion of the Transcontinental Railroad. The story of postal history in this country is very much one of communication and the spread of both mail and information, with the railroad being integral to that story. As the west coast of the United States became more and more populated, aided by the 1849 California Gold Rush, the vast geographic distance between population areas became a barrier to the movement of people and information. The idea of uniting the country with a railroad was born in the middle of the 19th century, and two companies began working on this monumental undertaking in the 1860s; Union Pacific Railroad starting from Omaha moving east, and Central Pacific Railroad starting in Sacramento and working their way west.[1]

What was the outcome of most efforts to improve Chinese working conditions on the transcontinental railroad?
Railroad spike hammer featured in gallery experience cart.

The new gallery experience cart at the National Postal Museum provides visitors the opportunity to engage with objects involved in the construction of the railroad, such as the measuring chains used by surveyors, hand drills, chisels, and railroad spikes. The cart also illuminates the contributions and experiences of Chinese immigrants, who built the majority of the western part of the railroad amidst challenging conditions and discriminatory practices. One thing that set the Chinese railway workers apart from their American counterparts was their diet; this is represented on the gallery cart by a squat, thick ceramic jug that was used to store soy sauce. Immigrants largely maintained a traditional Chinese diet, which served them very well. Not only did it include much more nutrition than the average worker’s diet with the inclusion of dried vegetables, their drinking habits were also different. Rather than drink water, they tended to drink either tea or hot water, both of which had been boiled. This significantly decreased their chances of contracting water-borne illnesses, making them much more effective workers. The cart provides insight into the lives and history of this early Asian-American population.

What was the outcome of most efforts to improve Chinese working conditions on the transcontinental railroad?
Cart objects (left to right): engineer's or surveyor's chain; soy sauce jug; hand drill or star chisel.

The hiring of Chinese-American workers became a crucial part of the construction of the railroad, and in the end had a profound effect on the United States’ development as a nation, its immigration policies, and its Asian-American population. Chinese immigration to the west coast began in the 1850s, driven by the availability of agricultural and factory jobs; newly discovered gold mines in California were an additional draw.[2] Central Pacific Railroad-- a company contracted by Congress-- started laying track in 1865, but the primarily white labor pool in California at the time was scarce and unreliable. The railroad company experimented with hiring Chinese laborers, despite racially-driven protests from white workers and foremen.[3] After a successful trial run where 50 Chinese laborers were tested, the company began hiring them in droves. They soon made up the main body of labor for Central Pacific, as the company constructed the hardest stretch of the railroad, through the Sierra Nevada Mountains.[4] They made less than their white counterparts, and in 1867 participated in an (eventually unsuccessful) strike for equal pay.[5] The Chinese laborers often did the most dangerous parts of the construction, including the dynamiting of mountain tunnels.[6] Many men lost their lives constructing the transcontinental railroad; estimates range from 150 to 2,000. Most of these were Chinese Americans.[7]

The Chinese-American population expanded vastly during the production of the railroad; between 10 and 15 thousand Chinese-American workers were employed by Central Pacific during the peak of construction. When the two railroads, one moving east from Sacramento and one moving west from Omaha, met at Promontory Summit, Utah in 1869, there was a celebration.[8] The railroad unified the vast country in a very real way, which was of special symbolic importance so soon after the Civil War.[9] In the news reports covering the completion of the railroad, very little mention was made of the Chinese Americans who had played such a crucial role in its construction. In a well-known and widely-circulated photograph depicting the celebratory ceremony, they are notably absent.*[10] 

What was the outcome of most efforts to improve Chinese working conditions on the transcontinental railroad?
"East and West Shaking Hands at Laying Last Rail." Ceremony for the driving of the golden spike at Promontory Summit, Utah on May 10, 1869. Photograph by Andrew J. Russell. Public Domain.

Following the festivities, many workers were dismissed and returned west, although several remained employed by Central Pacific to improve earlier construction that had been completed quite hastily.[11] As the number of Chinese Americans in the west increased, however, so too did anti-Chinese sentiment. Economic tensions quickly became prevalent, as many Chinese workers were willing to work for lower wages than their white counterparts. There were also cultural tensions as Chinatowns emerged in cities throughout the West Coast. Many Chinatowns were seen as places of prostitution, gambling, and opium by numerous white citizens who argued that the presence of Chinese immigrants compromised American morality. [12]

As a result of the anti-Chinese sentiment that became pervasive during this period, California made several efforts to slow or stop the influx of Chinese immigrants to their state, which had continued beyond the completion of the railroad. A series of laws were passed by the state from the 1850s to the 1870s that were ultimately negated by the federal government as a violation of a diplomatic treaty with China (the Burlingame-Seward Treaty).[13] An 1875 law known as the Page Act was successful in banning women from “China, Japan or any other Oriental country” who were suspected of prostitution.[14] In 1880 a new treaty with China allowing for the restriction of immigration was negotiated and in 1882, Congress passed the infamous Chinese Exclusion Act, which barred immigration from China for 10 years.[15] Exclusion had by this point become a national issue, as a prominent part of the Democratic party’s platform, and was a piece of their rehabilitation in the wake of secession and the Civil War.[16] Organized labor groups in the west had also made restriction of immigration integral to their political work. The Chinese Exclusion Act was extended periodically; in 1904, the extension was made indefinite. Its passage represents a shift from open immigration policies to ones that gave the federal government control over who was entering the country, using criteria such as nationality, ethnicity, gender, and class.[17]

Exclusion had a radical effect on the development of the United States’ population of Asian descent. The banning of immigration from China led to increased immigration from other parts of Asia, especially Japan, to replace the cheap labor Chinese workers had previously provided.[18] Japan was in the midst of rapid urbanization and industrialization following the 1868 Meiji Restoration, which led to upheaval and agricultural decline. The Pacific Coast and Hawaii were the most popular destinations for Japanese immigrants,[19] as Hawaii’s sugar plantations were a big draw.[20] By 1920, Japanese people represented 40% of Hawaii’s population.[21] Korean immigrants, many of whom had been converted to Christianity by missionaries in Korea, also moved to Hawaii in large numbers.[22] Indian immigration to the United States also commenced during this period following the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act, consisting of largely though not exclusively Punjabi Sikh men who had been disenfranchised by the land reforms following the 1849 British annexation of the Punjab, a region of India.[23] The Philippines was annexed by the United States in 1899, and Filipino immigrants soon began pouring into the country as well.[24] Much like the influx of Chinese immigrants, this multi-region Asian emigration led to an immediate backlash from white Americans. An Asiatic Exclusion League became active in San Francisco in the early 20th century, aggressively campaigning for a more expansive ban on Asian immigration.[25]

In 1910, the federal government opened a new immigration station at Angel Island, located near San Francisco, California. Officials moved the primary immigrant processing station from San Francisco to the island to better isolate people who needed quarantine, prevent escape, and ensure detained immigrants couldn’t communicate with the Asian-American population ashore. The vast majority of the Asian immigrants who arrived to the United States were processed at Angel Island for the next 30 years.[26] Upon a ship’s arrival to San Francisco, any Western Europeans and first class passengers were allowed entry into the city. Asians, or members of other immigrant groups, notably Mexicans and Russians (as well as anyone requiring a medical quarantine) were taken to Angel Island to be processed. There they were rigorously questioned on the details of their documents, subjected to extensive physical exams that were especially invasive by East Asian norms, and detained between two weeks and six months while their documents and interviews were corroborated.[27]

What was the outcome of most efforts to improve Chinese working conditions on the transcontinental railroad?
Poem carved into the wall of camp barracks. Image courtesy of Angel Island Immigration Station Foundation.

The legacy of the Chinese Exclusion Act also encompasses illegal Chinese immigration into the United States, as legal options were very limited under the law.[28] In 1906 the San Francisco earthquake destroyed the city’s municipal records, allowing Chinese-born people to claim that they were born in the United States, making them natural-born citizens, and allowing their children to enter the country. Thus the phenomenon of “paper sons” (and daughters)--people who came to the United States with false papers claiming to be the child of a “natural-born” citizen--became a prominent part of Angel Island’s story. Immigration officials developed grueling interrogations to counter this practice,leading to lengthy delays for Chinese immigrants especially.[29] In its 30 years as an immigration station 175,000 Chinese immigrants were detained under dangerous conditions at Angel Island.[30] Officials deemed the barracks to be a firetrap (which turned out to be true, as a fire destroyed the immigration station in 1940). The food was also famously bad, and any outdoor and recreational time was very limited for detainees. Some carved poetry into the walls expressing their frustrations with their situation. The poems are expressive and evocative, speaking at length about depression and sorrow alongside longings for home or for freedom. [31]

In the early 20th century, as Angel Island was in use, there was a shift in how immigration policy was legislated. In 1908, the United States entered into what was known as the Gentleman’s Agreement with Japan. The informal agreement stipulated that the U.S. would allow the wives, children, and relatives of Japanese immigrants already living in the U.S. to enter the country, while Japan itself would take measures to limit any further immigration to the United States. There was no official piece of legislation that resulted from this agreement, but it did limit the growth of Japanese-American communities.[32] Later, inspired in part by the events of the First World War, nativists became a dominant force in American politics, and anti-immigrant sentiment grew in popularity.[33] In 1917 the United States government passed an immigration act that created what became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone. Anyone from “any country not owned by the U.S. adjacent to the continent of Asia” was not allowed legal entry into the country. [34] The subsequent Immigration Law passed in 1924 reinforced the exclusion of all Asians.[35] The precedent set by the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882--the first piece of legislation to limit immigration from a specific country--was expanded upon to openly prohibit immigration from an entire region (excluding the Philippines, which, having been annexed by the United States, was not subject to the same restrictions).[36]

What was the outcome of most efforts to improve Chinese working conditions on the transcontinental railroad?
Public notification of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Executive Order 9066. “All persons of Japanese ancestry” were instructed to report for incarceration.

The period following Angel Island’s use as an immigration station was marked by two important things: Japanese incarceration during the Second World War, and the replacement of Asian exclusion with immigration quotas. Following President Roosevelt’s 1942 enactment of Executive Order 9066, people of Japanese descent living in the United States, U.S. citizens or not, were imprisoned in camps around the country. By 1945, 125,000 Japanese Americans--about half of whom were children--had been subjected to incarceration.[37] The other significant development during this period was the replacement of bans on Asian immigration with quotas, which took place in the 1940s. In 1943, the Chinese Exclusion Act was finally repealed; instead a quota of 105 visas per year for Chinese immigrants was established. This decision was directly related to the ongoing Second World War, in which China was an ally in the fight against the Axis powers, of which Japan was a major player. The repeal also led to measures in 1946 that allowed for immigration from the Philippines (no longer a territory of the U.S.) and India, albeit limited to a small number of visas as well.[38] In 1946, the War Brides Act was passed, allowing the Asian wives of American servicemen who had served overseas during WWII to come to the United States. [39] In 1952, Asian exclusion was completely ended with that year’s Immigration Act, although it established similar quotas to those previously in place for Chinese immigrants, severely limiting how many Asians could immigrate.[40] These more lenient, although still inequitable, policies ending exclusion are a product of the same era of the incarceration of the Japanese-American population.

The Immigration and Nationality Act--passed by Congress in 1965-- dramatically changed Asian immigration to the United States. The Act removed national-origin quotas, and stopped considering the nationality of immigrants altogether. It allowed for much higher numbers of Asians to enter the country than ever before. In 1960 Asians made up 5% of the foreign-born population; this number grew to 30% by 2014. Asia is now the second largest region of birth for foreign-born Americans, after Latin America.[41] There is no single dominant country of origin amongst Asian Americans; people of Chinese, Indian, and Filipino descent make up the greatest share, but there are also sizable Vietnamese, Korean, and Japanese populations throughout the country. There was a notable influx of refugees and immigrants from Southeast Asia in the years following the Vietnam War as well. Of the current Asian-American population, 59% were not born in the United States. Asians make up 13% of the unauthorized immigrant population of this country.[42] Although the rate of growth has slowed some, the number of Asian Americans continues to grow, and people of Asian descent have become a vibrant and prolific part of the United States.

There is a cycle to the history of Asian immigration to this country; an influx of Asian immigration tends to be followed by a negative reaction and, historically, attempts to curb further immigration. Xenophobia has been expressed not only in the immigration legislation of the day, but in laws governing the rights of Asian Americans, as well as in cultural depictions of Asians and people of Asian descent. This cycle of immigration and subsequent backlashes and animosity aimed at them drastically shaped the development of these diaspora populations as they exist today. Using the story of the Transcontinental Railroad as a starting point, The National Postal Museum’s new gallery cart allows visitors to explore and reflect on an important moment from the beginning of this long, complex history of the United States’ relationship with its population of Asian descent.

*EDITED TO ADD (December 3, 2021):
Media reports of the time often mention the role Chinese laborers played in the completion of the Transcontinental Railroad. However, these circulations regularly included racist undertones and "exoticisizing" of the immigrant workers was common. Though the Chinese laborers were absent from the Golden Spike ceremonies, this was unlikely a result of outright exclusion. The mobile camps that workers lived in were spread out over large areas, and at the time of completion, it is believed none were within walking distance of Promontory Summit. Much like events today, individuals present at the 1869 ceremonial activities included politicians, business managers, and people with influence, rather than the workers that made the event possible.

Resources:

  • [1] “Transcontinental Railroad.” 
  • [2] “Chinese Immigration and the Chinese Exclusion Acts.”
  • [3] “Transcontinental Railroad.” 
  • [4] “Cultural Impact of Building the Transcontinental Railroad.”
  • [5] Fuchs. “150 Years Ago, Chinese Railroad Workers Staged the Era’s Largest Labor Strike.”
  • [6] “Cultural Impact of Building the Transcontinental Railroad.”
  • [7] Obezinger, “Geography of Chinese Workers Building a Transcontinental Railroad,” (2018).
  • [8] Obezinger, “Geography of Chinese Workers Building a Transcontinental Railroad,” (2018).
  • [9] “Transcontinental Railroad.” 
  • [10]  Obezinger, “Geography of Chinese Workers Building a Transcontinental Railroad,” (2018).
  • [11] Obezinger, “Geography of Chinese Workers Building a Transcontinental Railroad,” (2018).
  • [12] “Chinese Immigration and the Chinese Exclusion Acts.”
  • [13] “Chinese Immigration and the Chinese Exclusion Acts.”
  • [14] “Chinese Exclusion Act.”
  • [15] “Chinese Immigration and the Chinese Exclusion Acts.”
  • [16] Hall,  “The Wasp’s Troublesome Children,” (2013). 
  • [17] Wu, “Chinese Exclusion Act.” Encyclopaedia Brittanica.
  • [18]  “Anti-Japanese Exclusion Movement.”
  • [19] “Japanese Immigration.”
  • [20] “Immigration from Japan.”
  • [21] Aleksey, “Japanese Immigration to the USA.”
  • [22] “History of Korean Immigration to America, from 1903 to Present.”
  • [23] “Immigration from India.”
  • [24] Batalova and Zong, “Filipino Immigrants to the United States,” (2018).
  • [25] “Anti-Japanese Exclusion Movement.”
  • [26] “History of Angel Island Immigration Station.”
  • [27] Wallenfeldt, “Angel Island Immigration Station,”Encyclopaedia Brittanica.
  • [28] Wu, “Chinese Exclusion Act.” Encyclopaedia Brittanica.
  • [29] “History of Angel Island Immigration Station.”
  • [30] Wallenfeldt, “Angel Island Immigration Station,”Encyclopaedia Brittanica.
  • [31] “History of Angel Island Immigration Station.”
  • [32] “Japanese Immigration.”
  • [33] “Immigration from Japan.”
  • [34] “U.S. Immigration Legislation Online: 1917 Immigration Act.”
  • [35] “Immigration from Japan.”
  • [36] Batalova and Zong, “Filipino Immigrants to the United States,” (2018).
  • [37] “Japanese Immigration.”
  • [38] “Repeal of the Chinese Exclusion Act, 1943.”
  • [39] “History of Korean Immigration to America, from 1903 to Present.”
  • [40]  “Repeal of the Chinese Exclusion Act, 1943.”
  • [41] Batalova and Zong, “Asian Immigrants in the United States,” (2016).
  • [42] López, Ruiz, and Patten, “Key Facts about Asian Americans.”

Bibliography:

  • Aleksey, Chigadaev. “Japanese Immigration to the USA,” (asian-studies.com/uploads/4/7/1/7/47170709/immigration_from_japan%C2%A0to_the%C2%A0usa_chigadaev_aleksey.pdf accessed November 18, 2019).
  • Batalova, Jeanne and Zong, Jie. “Asian Immigrants in the United States,” Migration Policy Institute, 2016, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/asian-immigrants-united-states.
  • Batalova, Jeanne and Zong, Jie. “Filipino Immigrants to the United States,” Migration Policy Institute, 2018, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/filipino-immigrants-united-states.
  • Fuchs, Chris. “150 Years Ago, Chinese Railroad Workers Staged the Era’s Largest Labor Strike.”https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/150-years-ago-chinese-railroad-workers-staged-era-s-largest-n774901.
  • Hall, Nicholas Sean. “The Wasp’s Troublesome Children: Culture, Satire, and the Anti-Chinese Movement in the American West.” California History 11, No. 2 (2013).
  • López, Gustavo, Ruiz, Neil G., and Patten, Eileen. “Key Facts about Asian Americans, a Diverse and Growing Population,” Pew Research Center, https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/08/key-facts-about-asian-americans/.
  • Obezinger, Hilton. “Geography of Chinese Workers Building a Transcontinental Railroad,” Chinese Railroad Workers in North America Project, 2018, http://web.stanford.edu/group/chineserailroad/cgi-bin/website/virtual/.
  • Wallenfeldt, J. “Angel Island Immigration Station,”Encyclopaedia Brittanica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Angel-Island-Immigration-Station.
  • Wu, Yuning. “Chinese Exclusion Act,” Encyclopaedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Chinese-Exclusion-Act.
  • “Anti-Japanese Exclusion Movement,” http://encyclopedia.densho.org/Anti-Japanese%20exclusion%20movement/.
  • “Chinese Exclusion Act,” (aapf.org/chinese-exclusion-act).
  • “Chinese Immigration and the Chinese Exclusion Acts,” https://history.state.gov/milestones/1866-1898/chinese-immigration.
  • “Cultural Impact of Building the Transcontinental Railroad,” https://railroad.lindahall.org/essays/cultural-impacts.html.
  •  “History of Angel Island Immigration Station,” https://www.aiisf.org/history.
  • “History of Korean Immigration to America, from 1903 to Present,” http://sites.bu.edu/koreandiaspora/issues/history-of-korean-immigration-to-america-from-1903-to-present/.
  • “Immigration from India,” https://www.kqed.org/w/pacificlink/history/angelisland/india.html.
  •  “Immigration from Japan,” https://www.kqed.org/w/pacificlink/history/angelisland/japan.html.
  •  “Japanese Immigration,” http://loc.gov/teachers/classroommaterials/presentationsandactivities/presentations/immigration/japanese.html.
  • “Repeal of the Chinese Exclusion Act, 1943,” https://history.state.gov/milestones/1937-1945/chinese-exclusion-act-repeal.
  • “Transcontinental Railroad,” http://www.constructioncompany.com/historic-construction-projects/transcontinental-railroad/.
  • “U.S. Immigration Legislation Online: 1917 Immigration Act,” (library.uwb.edu/Static/USimmigration/1917_immigration_act.html).

About the Author
Meera Muñoz Pandya spent the summer as an intern at the National Postal Museum, thanks to a grant from the Smithsonian’s Asian Pacific American Center. As a part of her internship, she has assisted the National Postal Museum with a variety of projects, including the development of a gallery experience cart that uses material culture to explore the history of the first transcontinental railroad’s construction, created in collaboration with the National Museum of American History. She is currently working as an Education Specialist at National Children’s Museum.