Achrol, Ravi S. 1991. “Evolution of the Marketing Organization: New Forms for Turbulent Environments.”Journal of Marketing 55 (October): 77–93.
Article Google Scholar
Achrol, Ravi S., Lisa K. Scheer, and Louis W. Stern. 1990.Designing Successful Transorganizational Marketing Alliances. Report No. 90-118. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
Google Scholar
Adler, Lee. 1966. “Symbiotic Marketing.”Harvard Business Review 44 (November–December): 59–71.
Google Scholar
Anderson, James C., Håkan Håkansson, and Jan Johanson. 1994. “Dyadic Business Relationships Within a Network Context.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 1–15.
Article Google Scholar
Ansoff, Igor A. 1957. “Strategies for Diversification.”Harvard Business Review 30 (September–October): 113–24.
Google Scholar
Arndt, Johan. 1979. “Toward a Concept of Domesticated Markets.”Journal of Marketing 43 (Fall): 69–75.
Article Google Scholar
“AT&T’s Crucial Charge Into Canada.” 1993.Financial Times of Canada August 14, pp. 4–5.
Badaracco, Joseph L., Jr. 1991.The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete Through Strategic Alliances. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar
Barney, Jay B. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.”Journal of Management 17 (March): 99–120.
Article Google Scholar
Bleeke, Joel and David Ernst. 1991. “The Way to Win in Cross-Border Alliances.”Harvard Business Review 69 (November–December): 127–35.
Google Scholar
Bucklin, Louis P. and Sanjit Sengupta. 1993. “Organizing Successful Co-Marketing Alliances.”Journal of Marketing 57 (April): 32–46.
Article Google Scholar
Buzzell, Robert D. and Bradley T. Gale. 1987.The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar
“Cafe Au Lait, aCroissant—and Trix.” 1992.Business Week August 24, pp. 50–1.
Child, J. 1987. “Information Technology, Organization and Response to Strategic Challenges.”California Management Review 29 (Fall): 33–50.
Google Scholar
Coyne, Kevin. 1985. “Sustainable Competitive Advantage—What It Is, What It Isn’t.”Business Horizons 29 (January–February): 54–61.
Article Google Scholar
Cravens, David W., Shanon H. Shipp, and Karen S. Cravens. 1993. “Analysis of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships, Strategic Alliance Formation, and Strategic Alliance Effectiveness.”Journal of Strategic Marketing 1 (March): 55–70.
Article Google Scholar
Cutts, Robert L. 1992. “Capitalism in Japan: Cartels and Keiretsu.”Harvard Business Review 70 (July–August): 48–55.
Google Scholar
Daft, Richard. 1983.Organization Theory and Design. New York: West Publications.
Google Scholar
Day, George S. 1992. “Marketing’s Contribution to the Strategy Dialogue.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 20 (Fall): 323–30.
Article Google Scholar
Day, George S. and S. Klein. 1987. “Cooperative Behavior in Vertical Markets: The Influence of Transaction Costs and Competitive Strategies.” InReview of Marketing. Ed. M. Houston. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 39–66.
Google Scholar
Day, George S. and Robin Wensley. 1988. “Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority.”Journal of Marketing 52 (April): 1–20.
Article Google Scholar
Dwyer, F. Robert, Paul H. Schurr, and Sejo Oh. 1987. “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 51 (April): 11–27.
Article Google Scholar
“For Bankrupt Companies, Happiness is a WarmKeiretsu.” 1992.Business Week October 26, pp. 48–9.
Ghemawat, Pankaj, Michael E. Porter, and Richard A. Rawlinson. 1986. “Patterns of International Coalition Activity.” InCompetition in Global Industries. Ed. Michael E. Porter. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 315–43.
Google Scholar
Gibson, Richard. 1990. “Cereal Venture is Planning Honey of a Battle in Europe.”Wall Street Journal November 14, pp. B1, B10.
Gupta, Ashok K., S. P. Raj, and David Wilemon. 1986. “A Model for Studying R&D—Marketing Interface in the Product Innovation Process.”Journal of Marketing 50 (April): 7–17.
Article Google Scholar
Hamel, Gary. 1991. “Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances.”Strategic Management Journal 12 (January–February): 83–103.
Article Google Scholar
Hamel, Gary, Y. Doz, and C. K. Prahalad. 1989. “Collaborate With Your Competitors—and Win.”Harvard Business Review 67 (January–February): 133–9.
Google Scholar
Harrigan, Kathryn R. 1984. “Multinational Corporate Strategy: Editor’s Introduction.”Columbia Journal of World Business 19 (Summer): 2–6.
Google Scholar
—— 1988. “Joint Ventures and Competitive Advantage.”Strategic Management Journal 9 (March–April): 141–58.
Article Google Scholar
Heide, Jan B. 1994. “Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels.”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 71–85.
Article Google Scholar
Hennart, Jean-Francois. 1988. “A Transaction Costs Theory of Equity Joint Ventures.”Strategic Management Journal 9 (July–August): 361–74.
Article Google Scholar
Hout, Thomas, Michael E. Porter, and Eileen Rudden. 1982. “How Global Companies Win Out.”Harvard Business Review 60 (September–October): 98–108.
Google Scholar
“How Ford and Mazda Shared the Driver’s Seat.” 1992.Business Week March 26, pp. 94–5.
Jarillo, J. C. 1988. “On Strategic Networks.”Strategic Management Journal 9 (January–February): 31–41.
Article Google Scholar
Johnston, Russell and Paul R. Lawrence. 1988. “Beyond Vertical Integration: The Rise of the Value-Adding Partnership.”Harvard Business Review 66 (July–August): 94–101.
Google Scholar
Kelly, Michael. 1990. “Strategic Alliances.”Investing in Canada 3 (Spring): 1–3.
Google Scholar
Knowlton, Christopher. 1991. “Europe Cooks up a Cereal Brawl.”Fortune June 3, pp. 175–9.
Kogut, Bruce. 1988. “Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.”Strategic Management Journal 9 (July–August): 319–32.
Article Google Scholar
“Learning from Japan.” 1992.Business Week January 27, pp. 52–8.
Lippman, S. A. and R. P. Rumelt. 1982. “Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency Under Competition.”Bell Journal of Economics 13: 418–38.
Article Google Scholar
Main, Jeremy. 1990. “Making Global Alliances Work.”Fortune December 17, pp. 123–6.
McKenna, Regis. 1991. “Marketing Is Everything.”Harvard Business Review 69 (January–February): 65–79.
Google Scholar
Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 20–38.
Article Google Scholar
Nielsen, R. P. 1987. “Cooperative Strategy in Marketing.”Business Horizons 33 (July–August): 61–8.
Article Google Scholar
Ohmae, Kenichi. 1985. “Becoming a Triad Power: The New Global Corporation.”The McKinsey Quarterly (Spring): 2–25.
——. 1987. “The Triad World View.”Journal of Business Strategy 7 (Spring): 8–19.
Article Google Scholar
——. 1989. “The Global Logic of Strategic Alliances.”Harvard Business Review 67 (March–April): 143–54.
Google Scholar
Oliver, Christine. 1990. “Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions.”Academy of Management Review 15 (April): 241–65.
Article Google Scholar
Parkhe, Arvind. 1993. “Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation.”Academy of Management Journal 36 (August): 794–829.
Article Google Scholar
“The Partners.” 1990.Business Week February 10, pp. 102–7.
Pfeffer, Jeffrey and Gerald Salancik. 1978.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Google Scholar
Porter, Michael E. 1980.Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar
—— 1985.Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Porter, Michael E. and Mark B. Fuller. 1986. “Coalitions and Global Strategy.” InCompetition in Global Industries. Ed. Michael E. Porter. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 315–43.
Google Scholar
Rapoport, Carla. 1990. “Mazda’s Bold New Global Strategy.”Fortune December 17, pp. 109–13.
-----. 1991. “Why Japan Keeps on Winning.”Fortune July 15, pp. 76–85.
Ruekert, Robert W. and Orville C. Walker. 1987. “Marketing’s Interaction With Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence.”Journal of Marketing 51 (January): 1–19.
Article Google Scholar
Schlender, Bernton R. 1993. “How Toshiba Makes Alliances Work.”Fortune October 4, pp. 116–20.
Sheth, Jagdish N. and Atul Parvatiyar. 1992. “Towards a Theory of Business Alliance Formation.”Scandinavian International Business Review 1 (3): 71–87.
Article Google Scholar
Spekman, Robert E. and Kirti Sawhney. 1990.Toward a Conceptual Understanding of the Antecedents of Strategic Alliances. Report No. 90-114. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
Google Scholar
Tallman, Stephen B. 1991. “Strategic Management Models and Resource-Based Strategies Among MNEs in a Host Market.”Strategic Management Journal 12 (Special Issue-Summer): 69–82.
Article Google Scholar
Terpstra, Vern and Bernard L. Simonin. 1992. “Strategic Alliances in the Triad: An Exploratory Study.”Journal of International Marketing 1 (1): 4–25.
Google Scholar
Varadarajan, P. Rajan. 1986. “Horizontal Cooperative Sales Promotion: A Framework for Classification and Additional Perspectives.”Journal of Marketing 50 (April): 61–73.
Google Scholar
Varadarajan, P. Rajan and Anil Menon. 1988. “Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy.”Journal of Marketing 52 (July): 58–74.
Article Google Scholar
Varadarajan, P. Rajan and Daniel Rajaratnam. 1986. “Symbiotic Marketing Revisited.”Journal of Marketing 50 (January): 7–17.
Google Scholar
Watson, Craig M. 1982. “Counter-Competition Abroad to Protect Home Markets.”Harvard Business Review 60 (January–February): 40–2.
Google Scholar
Webster, Frederick E., Jr. 1992. “The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation.”Journal of Marketing 56 (October): 1–17.
Article Google Scholar
Wells, John. 1984. “In Search of Synergy.” Unpublished dissertation. Harvard University. Boston.
Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1975.Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Page 2
- 2168 Article Accesses
- 0 Web of Science
- 341 CrossRef
Citation counts are provided from Web of Science and CrossRef. The counts may vary by service, and are reliant on the availability of their data. Counts will update daily once available.
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.