The value based approach to ethics focuses on required behavior, discipline and punishment.

  • ABET. (2018). Criteria for accreditating engineering programs. Retrieved February 9, 2020, from //www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/E001-19-20-EAC-Criteria-11-24-18.pdf.

  • American College Health Association. (2018). National college health assessment. Retrieved November 15, 2019, from //www.acha.org/documents/ncha/NCHA-II_Spring_2018_Reference_Group_Executive_Summary.pdf.

  • Ames, R. (2011). Confucian role ethics: A vocabulary. Hong Kong, China: The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arce, D. G., & Gentile, M. C. (2015). Giving voice to values as a leverage point in business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 535–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnwell, P. (2016, July 25). Students’ broken moral compasses. The Atlantic.

  • Bashe, A., Anderson, S. K., Handelsman, M. M., & Klevansky, R. (2007). An acculturation model for ethics training: The ethics autobiography and beyond. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(1), 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronowski, J. (1956). Science and human values. New York, NY: Julian Messner Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. (2019). The second mountain. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, M. (2015). Spirituality incorporated: Including convergent spiritual values in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 779–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. (1980). Goals in the teaching of ethics. In D. Callahan & S. Bok (Eds.), Ethics teaching in higher education (pp. 61–80). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, G. D. (2014). Engineering ethics: Peace, justice, and the earth (2nd ed.). San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology and Human Values, 39(1), 42–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlin, E., & Zandvoort, H. (2011). Broadening ethics teaching in engineering: Beyond the individualistic approach. Sicence and Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1991). Thinking like an engineer: The place of a code of ethics in the practice of a profession. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 20(2), 150–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2014). Professional ethics without moral theory: A pratical guide for the perplexed non-philosopher. Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy, 6, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2015). Engineers, emotions, and ethics. In S. S. Sethy (Ed.), Contemporary ethical issues in engineering (pp. 1–11). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, K. C. (2017). A tapestry of values: An introduction to values in science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2013). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S. O. (2017). Theories and methods for the ethics of technology. In S. O. Hansson (Ed.), The ethics of technology: Methods and approaches (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. (2008). The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. R. (2005). Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, M., Carpenter, D., Sutkus, J. A., Finelli, C., & Harding, T. (2012). Framing faculty and student discrepancies in engineering ethics education delivery. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephson Institute for Ethics. (2012). 2012 report card on the ethics of American youth. Retrieved November 5, 2019, from CHARACTER COUNTS! National Office: //charactercounts.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/ReportCard-2012-DataTables.pdf.

  • Karwat, D. M. (2019, October 28). Self-reflection for activist engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics.

  • Kipnis, K., & South, D. B. (2000). Personal values & professional ethics. Journal of Forestry, 98(7), 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luegenbiehl, H. (2004). Ethical autonomy and engineering in a cross-cultural context. Techne, 8(1), 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luegenbiehl, H. (2010). Ethical principles for engineers in a global environment. In I. van de Poel & D. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda (pp. 147–159). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luegenbiehl, H. C., & Puka, B. (1983). Codes of ethics and the moral education of engineers. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 2(4), 63–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyes, W. A. (1952). The scientist’s code of ethics. Physics Today, 5(3), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, J., & Sisodia, R. (2014). Conscious capitalism. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. (2000). Meaningful work: Rethinking professional ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (2005). Ethics in engineering (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, C. (2014). The true grand challenge for engineering: Self-knowledge. Issues in Science and Technology, 31(1), 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, C., & Duvall, R. S. (1999). Engineering ethics. London, UK: Person.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K. (2010). Emotions and values. In P. Goldie (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of emotion (pp. 475–500). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (n.d.). America COMPETES Act RECR training requirements. Retrieved March 26, 2020, from //www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/rcr.jsp.

  • National Society of Professional Engineers. (2019, July). NSPE code of ethics for engineers. Retrieved March 26, 2020, from //www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics.

  • O’Donohue, J. (2008). To bless the space between us. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. (2004). A hidden wholeness: The journey towards an undivided life. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. (2020). Ethics for engineers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (2019). The elements of moral philosophy (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Narvez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, S. (2012). Emotional engineers: Toward morally responsible design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1), 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinetar, M. (1988). Elegant choices, healing choices. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaton, A. (2015). Meritocracy, technocracy, democracy: Understandings of racial and gender equity in American engineering education. In S. H. Christense, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham, & B. Newberry (Eds.), International perspectives on engineering education (pp. 171–190). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snieder, R., & Schneider, J. (2016). The joy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troesch, V. (2014). A phenomenological approach to teaching engineering ethics. In 2014 IEEE international symposium on ethics in science, technology and engineering.

  • van de Poel, I., & Royakkers, L. (2011). Ethics, technology, and engineering: An introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesilind, P. A., & Gunn, A. S. (1998). Engineering, ethics, and environment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitbeck, C. (2011). Ethics in engineering practice and research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wike, V. S. (2001). Professional engineering ethical behavior: A values-based approach. In American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition.

  • Zhu, Q., & Jesiek, B. (2017). A pragmatic approach to ethical decision-making in engineering practice: Characteristics, evaluation criteria, and implications for instruction and assessment. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(3), 663–679.

    Google Scholar 

Page 2

Diagram of different levels of ethics education and the connection of values

Postingan terbaru

LIHAT SEMUA